![]() |
|
| Google Site Search: |
2008-08-18
Source:
Analysis: The "official" solutions in books and the Internet disagree on the status of this problem. Some let Black capture White's stones outright. Others only give Black a direct ko. As seen by the diagrams below, both evaluations seem to be wrong; optimal play seems to give Black an advantageous multi-step ko!
If any reader can show why optimal play by both sides
does not give Black an advantageous multi-step ko,
then be the 1st person to email the
Problem of the Week Editor
to win a prize of two back issues of
Go World magazine! The Problem Editor's judgement
is final.
Solution follows
(or click here to download SGF)
But see the next diagram for how Black can do even better!
At 1st glance, White 4 seems to greatly increase the size of an apparent direct ko by threatening to spill out down the left side. But through 8, White only has a disadvantageous 2-step ko, i.e., White has to ignore 2 ko threats to win the ko.
See the next diagram for Black's follow up.
Black starts this direct ko with 11. White cannot end the ko with the capture of 4 stones at 12, because Black's "under the stones" play at 13 captures the White stones! Note that Black has already made an as yet unanswered move at 9.
So to win this ko, White would have had to have given Black
a total of THREE moves elsewhere!
Note that even in this line, White still had a chance to
transpose into the disadvantageous 2-step ko by playing
move 4 one space above Black's move 5.
See the SGF for even more variations.
Email the Problem Of The Week editor at potw@usgo.org
Hits: 831
|